Featured Olympic Games stories

Print

A WONDERFUL PERFORMANCE BY ALL

 

One thing for certain is that Canadians had an unprecedented experience during the 2010 Vancouver Olympic Winter Games.

That was so evident from the record-breaking television audiences, enthusiastic spectators at the Olympic venues, and the enormous congregation of cheerful and patriotic fans that lined the street and squares of Vancouver  and Whistler. The media from all over the world seemed to agree.

So, we thank the VANOC staff and volunteers for staging these wonderful Games, including the sensational torch run.

Own the Podium is delighted by the accomplishments of our winter sports over the past five years that we have worked with them. Our mandate was to provide resources and opportunities to targeted sports to help them meet their performance goals at the Games. The Olympic Games was the ultimate test for their athletes as they were expected to perform under unusual home pressures. They performed magnificently – all of them- and we want to thank them and their coaches and support personnel for making Canadians so proud.

And they did perform. Twenty-six medals, 14 gold, seven 4th place finishes, 17 5th place finishes, and 72 top eight finishes, the most of any nation.  What is different than ever before is that we had more gold (14) medals than silver and bronze combined (12), and we had the most top eight finishes of any country. We have shown the world that we have significant depth of field at both the top and depth right behind.

All this success would not have been possible without the creation of Own the Podium, and without our funding partners. Sport Canada provided 56% of funding, VANOC corporate and provincial and territorial partners 38%, the COC 5%, with the CPC provided about 1%. The Canadian public also contributed through donations and the purchase of those great red mittens. For this we thank you.

This was a very worthwhile project that did a lot of good for Canadian sport and for our great country and its citizens.

Thank you, all, from OTP and in particular, its winter team.

 



Might It Possibly Be OK If We Kick Some Ass?

Why the world finds Canada's quest for Olympic gold strange and adorable.

By Dahlia Lithwick

Slate.com

 

Gold medal-winning moguls skier Alexandre Bilodeau of Canada With the Winter Olympics opening this past weekend in Vancouver, the great big story from the Great White North is that Canada is really, truly, finally done with being Mr. Nice Guy/Gal/Person of Niceness. Having failed to score a hometown gold medal in either the 1976 Summer Olympics in Montreal or the 1988 Winter Games in Calgary, Canada unloosed a $118 million project called "Own the Podium." In addition to offering gold medal winners $20,000 apiece, Canada has devoted millions to win a little Olympic bling. This has generated great astonishment around the world as reporters, accustomed to images of Canada as the world's great frost-encrusted doormat, have been forced to contend with the newly aggressive Canuck mindset. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, eh?

 

 

Someday, someone is going to explain to me why it is that journalists so frequently speak about Canadians as though we are all about 2 feet tall and 7 years old. See, for instance, this exceedingly strange New York Times piece about how those tiny little Canadians are building a "giant laser" or some such thing, in order to bring home more Olympic medals than ever before. Look! Look at all those funny little Canadians in their funny little hats, trying to be good at sports! Look at them spending their whole allowance on a top-secret program to create a human slingshot for speed skaters and "super-low-friction bases for snowboards and [to find out] whether curling brooms really melt the ice." The Seattle Times describes this effort as "Canada's non-nuclear Manhattan Project."

 

It was bad enough when they were calling us "un-Canadian" and "inhospitable" just for wanting to win medals. It got uglier last Friday when Georgian luger Nodar Kumaritashvili was tragically killed in a practice run. The Canadians' decision to limit outsiders' use of Olympic facilities before the Games began—a maneuver that every other host country pulls—got spun as "an unfortunate nationalistic impulse" that put patriotism ahead of safety. The subtext: When Canadians care about winning just as much as the rest of the world, can there be any more warmth and goodness left in the universe?

 

Ink has also been spilled—not a lot, mind you—on the alleged rivalry between the United States and Canada; at least 87 percent of which is actually a rivalry between Stephen Colbert and Canada. Canadians tend to think Americans are loud and boorish. Canadians are generally dismissed by Americans as boring and staggeringly polite and nice. With the exception of hockey, which the New York Times describes as "the escape valve that makes Canadian niceness possible," Canadians are invariably painted as hopelessly childlike and sweet. Until they become evil.

 

Colbert has said that "Own the Podium" seems a little more strident than the previous Canadian slogan: "Pardon, would it trouble you if we won a medal or two? It would? OK. Never mind." Of course, this effort to caricature Canadians has been aided most of all by Canadians. You know you're suffering an international feistiness deficit when your prime minister begs his fellow citizens to show the world a little more testosterone. "We will ask the world to forgive us this time," declared Stephen Harper in an effort to rouse Canadians into showy displays of patriotism, "this uncharacteristic outburst of patriotism and pride, our pride of being part of a country that is strong, confident and stands tall among the nations."

 

What's strange about all this deep Freudian analysis is that Canada has done pretty darn well on the hardware front in recent years. It jumped from 13 medals in 1994 to 24 at Turin in 2006. Canada ranks seventh overall in winter medal wins. Not bad for a country of 33 million people where per capita spending on Olympians has historically been a fraction of what some other countries spend. Is it possible that Canada has been doing just fine at the Winter Olympics but nobody ever bothered to notice?

 

Even odder is the relentless media focus on the inexplicable nature of Canada's quest for medals—as though every host nation doesn't do the same exact thing. China had Project 119 for the Beijing Olympics, and nobody accused the Chinese of trying to win because they lacked self-esteem. UK Sports, too, has launched Mission 2012 to kick butt in two years at the London Games. Canada deciding to shovel a bit of green toward its quest for gold is only bizarre to the extent one expects Canada to be uniquely—and as a matter of immutable national character—desirous of losing.

 

And that seems to be the real story here: Canada's effort to overcome an alleged national tendency to choke at the podium. The Boston Globe makes this point explicitly when it writes that "for decades, our northern neighbors have looked over their shoulders when stepping onto the Olympic medal stand. Do we really belong up here, they wonder? Isn't there a scoring error? Didn't someone file a protest?" It's not just that Canada isn't very competitive. According to this narrative, we actually live to fail. We're somewhere around the 26th greatest country on earth and that's just fine.

 

It has always seemed to me that sweeping efforts to identify a Canadian national character are pointless. It's a vast country built on compromises between French and English, Canadians and the British. The nation differs so fundamentally from east coast to west that, Olympics notwithstanding, it's hard to know what a Newfoundlander and a British Columbian might find to talk about. But as a Canadian, I would say that if we tend not to crow about our achievements, it's not because we don't care to achieve—it's because we don't much care to crow. There's a difference.

 

This fundamental difference between Canadians and Americans could be summed up in a single medal ceremony. On Monday, moguls skier Alexandre Bilodeau was awarded the gold medal Canada had been waiting for, and the crowd was wild with transcendent joy. But as the cameras panned the audience, and their lips moved with the words of "O Canada," it became clear that the Quebecer Bilodeau was mouthing bits of the French version. The fact that his lips were making different shapes than most of the rest of the crowd made the moment utterly wrong for NBC. But also perfectly Canadian.

 

I've rooted breathlessly for Canada in the Olympics my whole life. So does my little brother who lives in Australia. We just do it quietly. If Canada tops the medal table this year, our heads will blow off. Canadians have always been insanely proud of their Olympic athletes and passionate about winning. It's just that, by and large, crushing world domination isn't really our thing. Except in hockey. If the media are right about anything, it's that we care more about hockey than anything else. We always have, and we always will. If that's the big international scoop here, it's a little late.

 

In other words, it's not that Canadians have changed, it's that the story the world wants to tell about us these next two weeks has changed. We aren't in fact hapless and adorable. And here's a final guess: If Canada ever does decide to go for sweeping global domination someday, we won't do it by showing the world that we are the fastest lugers or the spinniest skaters. Dominance in cold-weather sports would only make us look even more, well ... Canadian. Nope, I promise you this: If we ever opt to really let fly and reveal our true, complicated, ass-kicking, grown-up Canadian selves to the world, it'll be in some completely unexpected, un-snow-related way.

 

Like space travel.

 

For the full story and picutres please visit www.slate.com



Introducing “Q”: OTP’s Gadget Guru



 

The moniker “Top Secret Program” conjures up images of clandestine meetings and hushed conversations in a James Bond-esque lair.  The reality isn’t that far off. 

The Top Secret Program is Own the Podium’s research and development project designed to provide Canada's winter athletes with the best equipment, technology, and knowledge giving them a unique competitive edge.  Creating this edge involves leveraging the latest technology and conducting groundbreaking research with universities from across Canada. 

And just like a Bond film, discretion is paramount.  In the highly competitive world of elite sport, these projects are treated as state secrets.  All parties, including, researchers, National Sport Organizations (NSO’s), athletes, support staff have signed air tight non-disclosure agreements.  This cloak of secrecy only fuels the curiosity from the international sporting community. 

Dr. Todd Allinger is the Manager of the Top Secret Program and to continue the James Bond metaphor, he is “Q.”  Utilizing his background in Mechanical Engineering, he oversees 55 projects designed to develop the techniques, tools and equipment to create that elusive edge.  The repertoire of inventions range from GPS units strapped on to the Alpine team, to secret base compounds for skis and snowboards, to human sling shots.  The Top Secret projects research involve radar guns, databases, reading brain waves, infrared lights and a treadmill with more buttons than an airplane.

As the medals start rolling in Allinger is confident his gadgets and research are helping the Canadian athletes.  He states, “Canadian athletes are going to the line knowing they have the best equipment and suits possible.  They know every possible technological application and advantage have been explored fully by a team of experts.” 

Will these technological advances translate into more medals?  “I would be surprised if we do not beat the previous medal totals,” says Allinger.  And he never jokes about his work.

 



Top Secret Contributions

Capital News Online

By Kian Khoshnevis

 

Alpine skier Kelly VanderBeek’s lifelong dream of winning an Olympic medal was shattered when she missed the podium by three hundredths of a second in the Super-G event, during the 2006 Turino Winter Games.

Today, Gerard Lachapelle and his team of researchers at the University of Calgary hope their work with Canada’s alpine ski team and GPS systems will prevent a similar result at the upcoming 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics.

Canada's alpine ski team took to the slopes with Gerard Lachapelle's state-of-the-art GPS system

Lachapelle is among 150 researchers from 17 universities and institutions across the country who have been working to improve equipment, technology, information and training for Canadian athletes through the federally-financed Own the Podium program’s five-year, $8-million Top Secret Project.

In 2004, the project combined ideas from Canada’s 13 national winter sport organizations, businesses, and universities and recruited the country’s top researchers to work on 55 prioritized projects.

The projects were separated into four areas: competition clothing, ice sports, snow sports and human performance.  The Project’s manager, Todd Allinger says it was an easy process to find researchers for the different areas.

“We have the experts in Canada. We really don’t need to go overseas to find the experts in all areas of sport,” he says. “It’s just that in the past, we haven’t had the resources or funding that promoted them to help out.”

In preparation for the Vancouver 2010 Olympics, they did. Each project received a relatively equal piece of the funding pie.

Lachapelle, an expert in GPS systems, got $20,000 from Top Secret as well as additional funds from the province of Alberta, for his alpine GPS project, which aimed to help the ski team determine the quickest route from the gate to the finish line.  Lachapelle believes everyone benefitted from the partnership.

“It went well because the coaches and skiers we worked with were very open to try this new technology,” Lachapelle says. “It’s wonderful for our athletes because it will hopefully provide them with the winning edge.”

More than skiers benefit

The Canadian Curling Association had already recruited Pierre Baudin, a sport scientist at the University of Alberta, before the Top Secret Project provided him with $100,000 to study the biomechanics of the curling throw.

Baudin converted a curling rink in Edmonton into a long-term research centre where curlers and their coaches can dissect the subtleties of their game, for example how they throw the rock or where to place their brooms.

He says the money from Top Secret was very important in leaving a legacy for curling in Canada.

“Money like that hasn’t been available for this sport’s research for almost 30 years,” Baudin says. “We now have a one-of-a-kind research facility that serves as a space for Canada’s developing high-performance curlers.”

An expert in fluid mechanics, Savvas Hatzikiriakos submitted ideas to Top Secret during a meeting at the University of British Columbia in 2006.  The organization liked his friction-reducing prototype compound for the base of skis and gave Hatzikiriakos’ team of UBC researchers $400,000 to develop it and another friction-reducing prototype for the base of speed skates.

Future prospects

It's unclear what level of funding will continue for winter athletes after the 2010 Games.  Allinger says the Top Secret project could unfortunately be the first to take a hit.  

“I don’t want to leave the traction and knowledge we’ve gained and all the expertise of the universities that we’ve engaged,” he says. “It would be a shame if all of the research we’ve done dies.”

For some researchers in the project, like Hatzikiriakos, work will continue even if funding is lost.

“The technologies we’ve been working with can be applied to different areas like in nanodevices and medical implants,” he says. “We’re in the process of putting together some applications and using whatever we’ve gained in the past three years to develop something new.”

Baudin says there is still work to be done in curling research, which will be helped with the permanent new research facility in Edmonton.

 “There are still questions that have to be answered and there are still things we’re trying to learn about curling,” he says. “We will continue to operate our research facility and study the game for Canada’s curlers.”

For others, like Lachapelle, a passion for sport keeps them working towards technological improvements.

“Whether OTP gets funding or not, I will be there with my team to continue to help our trainers and coaches use our technology and turn that into a long-term success.”

Success that he hopes will result in more podium finishes for Canadian skiers in Vancouver and in future Olympic Games.

For the full article and photos please visit: http://www.capitalnews.ca/index.php/news/top-secret-contributions

 

 

 



Over 2 Million Canadian “Wear their Hearts on their Hands”

 

You’ve seen them everywhere.  They are adorable, affordable, practical and quintessentially Canadian.  The Vancouver 2010 Red Mittens are the clear “must have” items for the upcoming Games.

The red knitted mittens with fleece-lining have the Olympic rings on the back and a white maple leaf stitched on the palm.  They are sold for $10 a pair at most HBC outlets (www.hbc.com), but have been hard to come by – with shipments being snapped up within several frenzied hours.

These illustrations of Canadian pride also serve to support Canada’s winter Olympic hopefuls.  Approximately $4 from the sale of each pair goes to Own the Podium for high performance equipment and world class training opportunities.

The Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Winter Games (VANOC) reports over 2 million pairs of the mittens have been sold by the first week of February, which explains their ubiquitous nature.  Not only are they worn by the 12,000 Olympic torch bearers, they are worn by supporters lining the torch route, cheering as the torch passes through their communities.  They have been seen in every corner of the country from Kugluktuk, Nunavut, to St. John’s, Newfoundland to Fort Nelson, British Columbia.

They have also been spotted farther afield on the beautiful beaches of Australia, and on the hands of our Canadian troops in Afghanistan.  The Government of Canada gave the Red Mittens as gifts to 62 Haitian children when they were recently airlifted to Canada to join their new families.

All this support is reaching the athletes, attests Veronica Brenner, a silver medalist in aerials at the Salt Lake 2002 Olympic Winter Games.  "As an athlete, it's incredibly motivating to see the support of Canadian fans in the crowd at the Games," said Brenner. "The Red Mittens campaign takes that support even further - it's a visible reminder that the wearers of the mittens believe in you as an athlete and are supporting your efforts to fulfill your dreams in 2010 and beyond."

With two millions pairs sold before the Olympic Games even begin, it’s clear Canadians far and wide are truly wearing their hearts on their hands.

 

 



The NRC edge

"Science and technology are now part of the equation of making a champion. Research can put seconds in an athlete's back pocket." Dr. Guy Larose, NRC

To help prepare for Vancouver 2010, Canada's Own the Podium 2010 organization put NRC scientists to work in areas that are crucial to improving athletic performance. Dr. Guy Larose, and Annick D'Auteuil, of the NRC Institute for Aerospace Research (NRC-IAR) have been working alongside many of our winter Olympians to help them achieve a winning edge.

Dr. Guy Larose specializes in bluff body aerodynamics. He has worked with Canada's Olympic athletes since preparation began for the Torino Games in 2005. He is also a winter sports enthusiast who skis and plays hockey.

Annick D'Auteuil is a PhD candidate in mechanical and aerospace engineering at Carleton University (Ottawa, Canada), she is studying the aerodynamics of the human body. Her work involved testing the aerodynamics of Canada's speed skaters and their race suits. Enrolled in the Graduate Student Supplement Scholarship Program at NRC, she believes that NRC is the place to do experimental work in aerodynamics. "I would never have been able to do this research anywhere else. It's magic here," says Annick

In sports where speed is the critical factor, athletes and coaches search out ways to shave hundredths of a second off their finish times. But friction from ice and snow, as well as aerodynamic drag, are their worst enemies. These are the key factors that work against motion. That's where research into understanding the aerodynamics of the human body can give our athletes an edge.

At the 2002 Olympic Winter Games the Canadian team felt that they were at a disadvantage. Coaching, training and practice were not enough to produce the winning results they were looking for. It was then that Own the Podium was established and planning for Canada's Top Secret Program began. The goal was to add science and technology to the equation, converting 4th and 5th place standings to podium finishes.

2006, Torino, Italy: Science and technology enter the picture. NRC scientists worked with Canadian athletes during the eight months preceding the Games. The result was positive — more medal winning finishes for Canada than ever before.

To prepare for Vancouver 2010, Canada's Top Secret Program put scientists to work on four areas that are crucial to improving athletic performance in winter sports: snow friction, ice friction, aerodynamics and human performance. As Canada is the number one skating nation in the world, our speed skaters were the focus of intense research to help them reach peak performance.


A recipe to make the best skating suit possible

In speed skating, a solid understanding of airflow around the human body not only helps the athlete improve their body position and reduce drag; it is also critical when analyzing the performance of their race suits.

Knowing this, NRC researchers set out to investigate different factors that can influence the aerodynamic performance of the athlete and their equipment. To do this accurately, aerodynamic drag on the skater's body needed to be measured for several different body positions because skaters continuously change their body shape as they move around the track.

Most importantly, results from the aerodynamic performance tests had to be analyzed, interpreted and implemented quickly. Skaters were able to see and feel improvements resulting from even minor adjustments to their body position, race suit or both. Coaches could simulate race sequences and get real-time feedback. And the suit manufacturer, Descente LtdTM, was able to make rapid modifications to the race suits tested.

Based on NRC tests, the best race suit for Canada's speed skating team has been selected. According to Dr. Larose, "the suit has evolved significantly from that worn at the Torino games."

 

Ready to shred

Speed skating is not the only winter sport that benefited from NRC's expertise. Testing at NRC's Institute for Aerodynamic Research involved 11 winter sports: bobsleigh, skeleton, luge, alpine skiing, ski cross (a competition that will be showcased for the first time at the Vancouver Games), para-alpine skiing, nordic skiing/biathlon, para-nordic skiing, free-style aerial skiing, snowboard/snowboard cross and speed skating.

For the first time snowboard, para-alpine skiing, ski-cross and free-style aerial competitors visited NRC's wind tunnel, looking to make significant aerodynamic improvements to their sport. Canada's skeleton and luge teams were back, to refine and adjust their equipment. Two different sleighs were tested for the men's bobsleigh team and three-time Olympian Rob Boyd, now coach of the women's alpine ski team, brought his racers to NRC as well. Members of Canada's cross-country ski and biathlon teams as well as para-nordic competitors also paid a visit to NRC's test facilities.

"Being able to conduct rapid and accurate wind tunnel tests is NRC's advantage", says Dr. Larose. "Athletes can experience positive changes right away by making small adjustments to their body positions in the tunnel. Designers and manufacturers get rapid analyses on how equipment performs under various conditions".

Snowboarders likely found NRC testing to be an eye-opening experience. According to Dr. Larose, "boarders tend to go low to increase their speed but, unlike downhill racers, a tuck position in snowboarding does not increase speed. It increases drag." Not surprisingly, NRC tests resulted in recommended improvements to body positions over the board as well as to clothing styles.

They should be ready to shred — the course as well as the record books.

 

 

For more information, please contact:

Sheila Noble

Communications Officer

National Research Council Canada

Tel: 613-991-5738

Sheila.Noble@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca

 

 

 



Maclean's Exclusive: OLYMPIC SECRET REVEALED

An inside look at out high-tech, mind bending plans to dominate the podium at the 2010 Games

By Ken MacQueen & Nicholas Kohler 

In early December, Bob Joncas, the high-performance manager for the Canadian Snowboard Federation, boarded a jet for Switzerland.  In the cargo hold, rolled into a heavy bag, was the result of three years of hush-hush research, development and testing. Joncas was bound for a mountainside factory in Braunwald to deliver a secret weapon of sorts, one of dozens of clandestine products and tactics that Canadian athletes will deploy in February at the Vancouver 2010 Winter Games.

Joncas presented the bag’s contents to Hansjürg Kessler, considered by many elite athletes as the world’s best custom snowboard maker. Kessler was at work on a special Olympic order for the Canadian national team— tailored-to-measure boards with at least two significant modifications from any he has ever made. One was a super low-friction base, to be applied to the bottom of the boards from a 30-m roll of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene that Joncas carried from Canada. The other is a composite plate for bindings that is so revolutionary Canada’s boarders have hidden it under duct tape and MACtac during their frequent appearances on World Cup podiums this winter.

The base, which alpine boarders won’t use until Games time, cuts friction by 15 to 20 percent compared to commercially available products, its creators say. “Small differences can be huge,” says Christos Stamboulides, the University of British Columbia researcher who formulated the product. Less friction equals more speed, and perhaps a podium finish, says project supervisor Savvas Hatzikiriakos, a specialist in fluid mechanics and friction.  “In the last Olympics, Canada won a lot of fourth places,” he says. “Nobody remembers the fourth-place athletes.”

That quest for those small differences is what drives the aptly named Top Secret project—a five-year, $8-million technological arms race unprecedented in Canadian sport history. Researchers across the country have been breaking down the science of winter sport, looking for any edge in training, human performance and equipment. “To date, we’ve completed 55 projects, using 17 different universities and institutions,” says Todd Allinger, the Vancouver-based biomechanist who manages the program. “I think it’s been very successful.” Now, a month from the Olympic opening ceremonies, Maclean’s takes an exclusive inside look.

A NEW COLD WAR

Top Secret is part of an ambitious shift in Canadian sporting priorities, a change born of the sad fact that Canada has never won an Olympic gold medal on its home soil; not in Montreal in 1976, nor in Calgary in 1988. To prevent a repeat of that humiliation, Own the Podium (OTP) was created—a $110-million program jointly funded by government and corporations designed to give Canada’s elite winter  athletes the kind of financial, medical and technical support other leading sport nations take for ranted.

With that backing comes great expectations. The Canadian Olympic Committee’s stated goal is to win more medals in Vancouver than any other country, and to finish among the top three in the gold medal count at the Paralympic Winter Games in March. “We dared to say we wanted to be No. 1,” says OTP head Roger Jackson. “Some of the Canadian reaction is—‘It’s so un-Canadian, why don’t we just host everybody and have a good time?’ ” For Jackson, a tireless competitor whose own Olympic efforts  captured rowing gold at the 1964 Tokyo Olympics, that’s simply not good enough. “If we’re going to do this, why should we say, ‘Yes, we’re No. 3’? Why don’t we try to do something really special? It’s so much more fun.” 

The pointy end of the campaign for world domination is Top Secret. If the program’s covert, gadget heavy mandate recalls the Cold War, that’s not an inappropriate image. Ask Allinger if other nations have similar programs and the first thing that comes to mind is Berlin’s Institute for Research and Development of Sports Equipment, known by its German acronym FES. Founded in 1962, FES became a key element in creating the formidable (if not always steroid-free) sports machine that was East Germany. So successful was it, that it was included in the treaty that sealed German reunification in 1990. Today, it continues to do for modern Germany what it did in its cloak and dagger days: scare the bejesus out of its sporting rivals. 

Maintaining security this close to the Games is increasingly difficult. “So far, we haven’t had any breaches that we know about,” Allinger says. “At the beginning, all coaches and researchers had to sign a confidentiality agreement.” Athletes were also sworn to secrecy. If you have a boyfriend or girlfriend from another country, they were warned, “don’t talk in your sleep.”

The rationale for releasing the information now is part practical, part psychological. Athletes are currently out on the World Cup circuit. “If people can see it and it’s out in the open, what can you do?” asks Allinger.  Top Secret also stretched its budget by partnering with universities, and academics must publish or perish. A requirement to keep findings out of journals or the patent of?ce—standard practice for the secretive FES— would have doubled the cost of the research. Now that it’s too late for rivals to pinch the technology, it can’t hurt to throw a scare into the competition. “We want other countries to know we’re doing top-secret research,” says Allinger. That said, he admits that several projects remain under wraps. Jackson agrees: “There will be a number of things people have never seen before at the Games.”

 

BOARDER WAR

If there’s a smirk behind the smiles of Canada’s alpine snowboarders during their frequent appearances on World Cup podiums this winter, it has much to do with their curiously decorated Kessler boards. Under all that fake wood-grain MACtac is a racing plate elevated above the board, and rafted from laminated carbon composite instead of the usual aluminum. “What it looks like is a skateboard sitting on top of a snowboard,” says co-designer Gerry Kavanaugh, president of Apex Composites Inc., a Canadian outfit that normally works in the aerospace and defence sector.

The plate is the 14th iteration of a concept by veteran rider Jasey-Jay Anderson. During a camp in Whistler last year, the design was tweaked daily. Kavanaugh would take athlete feedback to a condo with head coach Mark Fawcett to craft new prototypes in a makeshift workshop on the balcony. “We were baking the stuff on the barbecue,” says Kavanaugh. In the past, boarders’ feet were mounted directly to the board, bouncing and tilting with every turn and bump. “Now, largely the board flexes underneath their feet,” says Kavanaugh, “and their feet stay put.”

 Those feet are often on the podium, but with so much team depth it’s hard to know what impact the plates have. “The system is definitely working, technically or mentally or both,” says Joncas, the high-performance manager. Rider Matt Morison gave a discreet nod to his camouflaged equipment after a World Cup win in Telluride, Colo. “My equipment is getting better and better all the time,” he said. “I knew everything under my feet was super fast.” 

Next up are the new superfast bases, already on some snowboard cross equipment. The Olympic courses are on West Vancouver’s Cypress Mountain, known for its volatile coastal weather. “Cypress,” says Joncas, “could be -15°C, it could be +15° C.” Each athlete has boards for both cold and warm conditions. If the snow is wet and sticky, warm-weather boards with the UBC’s hydrophobic (water-repellant) base should cut the friction.

 MIND GAMES

It was a bit unsettling at first, admits freestyle aerialist Kyle Nissen, to be wired with electrodes and see your various brainwaves, alpha, beta, theta, dancing on a computer screen; and watching it track every shift in respiration, heart rate, body temperature, sweat levels and muscle tension. “I was a little bit skeptical,” says the 10-year member of the national team. It helped that he had a long, trusting relationship with the woman at the controls, University of Ottawa sports psychologist Penny Werthner.

It’s one thing to tell your sports shrink you are mentally focused and physically loose, quite another to prove it through Werthner’s bio (physical) and neuro (mental) feedback machines. “Sport psychology is about what we’re thinking and what we’re feeling and you can’t really see those things,” Werthner says. “I find it a really intriguing and useful tool to make things a bit more concrete.”

The process of “self discovery,” as she puts it, began three years ago, and includes both the aerial ski team and top mogulists Alex Bilodeau and Jennifer Heil. Discovery is only the first step: the aim is to control one’s physical and mental response, to gear up in the moments before a performance, and as importantly, to learn to mellow out afterwards. “The season can be a real grind, so it’s important to stay fresh out there,” says veteran boarder Warren Shouldice. “It obviously stresses you out to think, ‘I’ve got to go off this four-metre-tall jump at 70 km/h.’ So if I can not think about that, it’s a good thing,” he says. “Yes, I want to think about it, but that’s for the 30 seconds before my jump.”

He and Nissen have learned to take minimental holidays on the lift up to their next jump and to put a higher premium on recovery time. They once spent down time blazing away at video games like Call of Duty or Guitar Hero until they wired up the feedback machines and discovered that what they thought was mindless fun was leaving them highly stressed. “We’re competitive people,” says Nissen. Now, they spend maybe 15 minutes listening to audio of slow human breathing: “You could almost call it meditation.”

 MISILE GUIDANCE SYSTEM ON THE SLOPES

As a missile guidance system, the Honeywell HG1700 is governed under the U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations. Those who work with the device must first undergo security clearance; Syrian, Iranian and Chinese nationals, among others, need not apply. Luckily for Gérard Lachapelle’s team at the University of Calgary’s Schulich School of Engineering, the HG1700 also fits in a downhill skier’s backpack. 

Why equip a skier with a device that, as Honeywell’s promotional literature describes it, “has a performance range consistent with tactical missile and smart munition requirements”?  Lachapelle needed to test that his new GPS unit was accurate enough to track a downhill skier’s progress to within five centimetres, even on steep slopes at 120 km/h.

 It worked. The GPS STEALTH is small enough that it doesn’t hinder a skier’s mobility but hardy enough to survive frigid temperatures and high-speed spills. Yet it can deliver reams of data on everything from a skier’s speed to his turn radius. Tailor-made software later translates the numbers into a computer-graphic cartoon skier negotiating slalom gates, striving for the shortest route between A and B. Used only during training— including on the very runs to be used during the Olympics—the system can help guide coaches and skiers into finding the best ways of attacking gates and turns. “GPS enables us to dissect certain aspects [of a course] that we never had the ability to before,” says James Perks, technology guru for Alpine Canada. 

The measurements provided by the GPS STEALTH are also helping zero in on a skier’s fastest equipment—even the best waxing technique for certain weather conditions. Alpine Canada and its Nordic cross-country counterparts use the GPS data, along with more traditional timing methods, as part of an equipment testing methodology developed at UBC.  That work has contributed to a computerized database where the variables on any given day temperature, snow condition, sun, etc.— can quickly determine what skis, waxes and base grinds will deliver optimal results.

Perks says the database takes some of the “voodooism” out of choosing the right materials for the right day; at the very least, it adds a scientific justification to the intuitive choices made by race technicians. “Especially in our sport, we’re down to hundredths of a second. We’re trying to reduce the equipment variables so that on any given day it comes down to the athletes,” he says. “You’d hate like hell to lose by a couple of hundredths and figure out later it’s the materials.”

 

REINVENTING THE SIT SKI

World champion para-alpine skier Josh Dueck remembers well the first time he used it. “It felt like I was on a wild horse,” he says. “It just had so much potential, I knew it was going to take me a little while to harness all that energy.” Sit skis have long been ad hoc affairs, contraptions athletes had to tweak in their garages to perfect. They had obvious shortcomings: an Austrian sit ski was subtle and responsive enough for technical competition but became unwieldy at high speed; a U.S. model was swift but not nimble. 

 

In search of a design that would give athletes “the equipment to win,” Denis Rancourt, a biomechanist at the Université de Sherbrooke, developed an articulated, adjustable sit ski that can fit all athletes for all events. “It’s basically the Swiss Army knife of sit skis,” says Dueck, “something that’s never been done.” By kicking the leg position up—“kind of like a recliner,” Dueck says—and adjusting the centre of mass, skiers gain the stability they need for speed in downhill. Knock the leg positions down and it suddenly provides the scalpel precision required for slalom and super-G events. A dual suspension system—one shock absorber for big bumps, another for more subtle, undulating terrain—borrowed from motocross and tweaked for winter conditions, helped round out the design.  The impacts of the new ski were immediate—three world championship titles last year between Dueck and fellow para-alpine skier Kimberly Joines. They sparked enormous interest among competitors. “They would swarm around our sit skis trying to get information,” says Dueck. “We didn’t want to be rude, but at the same time, we didn’t want to give away all those hard-earned secrets.”

THE SCIENCE OF SWEEP

Nolan Thiessen, 29, swears he can identify a curler’s home region by the way he or she throws a rock—little idiosyncrasies, the placement of a foot or a broom, that betray geography.  Thiessen, originally from Swan Lake, Man., but who now lives in Edmonton, grew up lifting the heel of his sliding foot off the ice in a throw, gliding along on his toes in classic Manitoba fashion. 

You won’t catch him doing that now (these days his gliding foot rests flush with the rink). Not after National Training Centre head coach Rob Krepps teamed up with University of Alberta’s Pierre Baudin to boil the art of throwing a curling stone down to its biomechanical essence. The work is some of the first scientific research into the sport of curling to take place in decades. “This is the biggest thing since moving from straw brooms to brushes 30 years ago,” Krepps says.

 Krepps and Baudin have helped convert a single curling sheet at Edmonton’s Saville Sports Centre into a $100,000 permanent curling laboratory and research centre.  Perched along the ice, front, rear and sides, sit 12 video and eight motion capture cameras, the latter used in conjunction with an athlete wearing reflective markers at each joint. The effect, once a performance is captured and loaded into a computer located just off the ice, is an articulated stick figure whose every movement can be dissected. The  tool helps Krepps weed out inefficiencies and glitches (the team rebuilt Paralympian Sonja Gaudet’s throw from scratch), while multiperspective instant replays give curlers quick feedback.

 

Other research helped answer the tantalizing question of what happens when curlers sweep the ice. For years it was understood that curling brooms, rigorously deployed on the rink before a gliding stone, brie?y melted the ice to reduce friction, thereby smoothing the rock’s passage home. That was before

Thomas Jenkyn, an orthopaedic biomechanist at the University of Western Ontario, trained his infrared camera on the rink. “What we found is—nobody’s melting anything,” says Jenkyn. Following the busy sweepers, Jenkyn’s camera captures the moment as a psychedelic swirl of colour, the ice heating to a warm red on the TV screen. Jenkyn has found that a curler’s sweep will momentarily raise the ice’s temperature one to two degrees (men heat things up more effectively than women), from around -5 to -3° C, reducing the surface friction enough to maintain the rock’s momentum and keep its journey straight—but not enough to convert the ice to water. 

 The finding has helped confirm a growing suspicion among curlers that they should frequently change their broom heads (in the old days a single head sufficed for the season) and avoid using wet brushes on the ice.

 RAMPING UP

It was work that had to be kept under wraps, even if it did all happen at Calgary’s Olympic Oval, one of the busiest centres of international training in the world. The machine is still there, a mean, industrial-looking modified treadmill three metres long and 2½ m wide, big enough to accommodate an athlete on roller skis. The ramp can levitate into a 35-degree incline to simulate uphill climbs for Nordic skiers, or accelerate to a brisk 60 km/h to push speed skaters to their limits.  Unforgiving, it forces athletes to keep up, whether they want to or not. “There’s no way you can slow down,” says Paul Dorotich, a

performance analyst with Speed Skating Canada. “If you do, you’re off the treadmill.” A harness that can suspend the athletes from above rescues stragglers.

 

What’s the point?  The oval already has an Olympic-standard track, cross-country skiers have the Rockies. Yet with mirrors, cameras, and projection screens set up around it, the treadmill is a laboratory of instant feedback and technical perfection. Here, the athletes don’t have to wait to view videos of their performances and try to recall directions given in the locker room. Coaches don’t have to catch glimpses of a blur zipping past at 55 km/h. “Lots of times, there’s a disconnect between what the athletes are doing and what they feel they’re doing,” says Dorotich.

The treadmill, says speed skater Andrew Godbout, “lessens the gap between doing something and seeing what you’re doing.”  Godbout, rocketing across the ramp’s endless surface, can peer into a screen set up before him and watch his own body in profile, adjusting his position— lowering his head, bending his knees—at his coach’s direction. “It takes months to figure out what the feeling of going fast is—searching for the feeling of your best race,” Godbout explains.

THE HUMAN SLINGSHOT

Margins of victory at the Richmond speed skating oval are as thin as the skaters’ skin suits.  Those suits, incidentally, are part of the inspiration for Allinger’s championing of the Top Secret program. Back in 2002, Allinger was living in Salt Lake City, attached to the U.S. Olympic speed skating team. He recalls sitting in the stands overhearing two discouraged top Canadian skaters. “We can’t beat those Americans,” one said. “Their suits are too fast.” Not good, thought Allinger. “Mentally, they had a barrier there.” 

 Not this year. Three years of fabric research, design and wind tunnel testing produced a suit that cuts air friction. Sports apparel maker Descente is producing the suits for exclusive Canadian use at Games time. “We know we’re going to have the fastest suit there based on what we’ve done,” says Allinger. Canada’s skaters have already had the benefit of one of the most exotic weapons in the Top Secret arsenal: the speed cable. Think of a human slingshot—or, as performance analyst Dorotich puts it, awater skier’s tow rope. Instead of a boat, there is a giant rotating spool. 

Cornering at high speeds is one of the greatest challenges skaters face. Since their training doesn’t usually peak until Olympic Games time, they are often hitting corners then at speeds they’ve rarely reached before. A wobble costs precious fractions of a second; a fall is disastrous. Skaters start at one end of the straightaway and are yanked up to speeds as high as 65 km/h. Then they let go of the rope, get into their skating stride and hit the corner, allowing them to practise their technique time after time. The system has proven popular among Canada’s Olympic-level skaters, and lineups for the catapult are common, says speed skater Godbout. The cable solves a coaching challenge, says Dorotich.

“It’s hard work to get up to that speed,” he says. “How do we train at high enough quality without overtraining them physically?”

 ALL’S FAIR. ISN’T IT?

It’s naive to think Canada is doing anything different from the kind of R & D work other countries have conducted for decades. “In a number of these areas, we’re catching up,” says Jackson. “In two or three or four areas, we’re probably moving ahead.” FES has just rolled out a new bobsled for the German team with an advanced aerodynamic design. The Norwegians, based on decades of research, are experts in Nordic skiing technology.

 But technology has a dark side. An argument can be made that the rash of injuries devastating the Canadian alpine team and several of its international rivals this season is due to ski technology that tests the limits of racecourse design and human physiology.  “The skis are getting better,” Canada’s Manuel Osborne-Paradis said after winning his second World Cup medal of the season. “Knees and ligaments aren’t.” He blamed a combination of factors, including the extreme cold, for the injuries that knocked five Canadian racers out of Olympic contention by mid-December. “Our equipment is evolving faster than our human bodies.”

It’s a process of evolution that’s only picking up speed in international sports. Canada risks getting left behind if—as happened after Montreal and Calgary—we stop backing our athletes with the financial and administrative resources brought to bear in the last four years. “Where do we go after the Games—does all of this special funding that was created disappear?” asks Jackson. “If it does, we lose everything: we lose 150 positions of coaches and sports science people, the whole Top Secret program.”  That could have a disastrous impact in two years. “We need to transfer a bunch of the knowledge to the summer sports, too,” says Allinger, who fears the will to finance elite sports programs may fade after the Olympics.  “That’s a concern,” he says. “But I think we’ll end up being No. 1, and who’s going to want to turn the tap off then?”



Can Canadian athletes deliver on the hype?

 

By Donna Spencer
The Canadian Press 

The term conversion rate will pop up at the 2010 Winter Olympics but it has nothing to do with tourists exchanging their yen or rubles for Canadian dollars. 

Conversion rates are about athletes with medal potential converting that potential into an Olympic podium finish in Vancouver and Whistler, B.C. 

Canada once had a weak conversion rate compared to the top winter sport countries such as Germany and the U.S. 

Canadian athletes who won medals in international World Cup events had trouble duplicating those performances at the Olympics. 

Improving Canada's conversion rate was the genesis of Own The Podium, the $117 million, five-year plan designed to get Canada winning more medals than any other country at its own Olympics. OTP was paid for mostly by the federal government and the Vancouver Olympic organizing committee. 

One of OTP's goals was to improve the environment of a potential medallist to the point where he or she could step onto the Olympic podium in 2010. That meant upgrading everything from medical support to their equipment. 

The formula is this: An athlete with a pair of top-five results in World Cups this winter is considered a potential medallist in Vancouver. Conversion rate is the percentage of medal potentials who actually win medals. 

At the 2002 Olympics Games in Salt Lake City, the Canadian team had 43 athletes with medal potential and won 17 medals. That's a conversion rate of 40 per cent compared to 71 per cent for the host U.S. and 67 per cent for Germany. 

But a closer look at Canada's performance in the sports of speedskating, freestyle, alpine and cross-country skiing - the events that give out the most medals - showed a conversion rate of just 27 per cent, compared to 92 per cent for Germany and 65 per cent for the U.S. 

In 2006, Canada improved its metal total drastically to 24, but could have won many more with 61 potential medallists. The country had 13 fourth-place finishes and eight fifth-place results. The conversion rate was 39 per cent, compared to 44 per cent for the U.S. and 38 per cent for Germany. 

OTP tracked conversion rates of athletes at their respective world championships in 2009 to get a picture of where Canada was a year out from the Games. Canada won the most world championship medals with 29 followed by Germany and the U.S. with 28. 

Conversion rates were 49 per cent for Canada, 47 per cent for Norway, which won a lot of medals with fewer potential medallists, the U.S. third at 42 per cent and Germany fourth at 36 per cent, according to OTP. 

The 2009-10 World Cup season has Canada, the U.S. and Germany virtually neck and neck in conversion rates heading into Vancouver, according to OTP. 

We're hoping we'll be 50 or greater at the time of the Games, which would put us in the hunt with everyone else, says OTP head Roger Jackson. We cannot do a lot worse than that. Otherwise, we'll lose medals we could have won. 

Our success will depend on taking things away from other teams. If we get a medal and Germany doesn't, that's a swing of two.

So why is conversion rate so important to Canada? If Canadian athletes can't deliver on the hype, which is the long-stated goal of winning more medals than any other country, their fellow-Canadians might not feel the Olympics were worth the cost. 

The host team will need more than 25 medals to be in the race for first place. 

If potential medallists fall short, Canada's total can propped up by dark horses. Cross-country skier Chandra Crawford of Canmore, Alta., was one of those athletes who came out of the blue to win Olympic gold in the women's sprint in 2006. 

We won't depend on it, but an athlete who is currently clearly in the top of the world, a World Cup leader, if they finish out of the medals, we could have that offset by some surprise, Jackson says. 

There will be a few surprises like that. I don't know how many of those, but it would be odd that we didn't have one, two or three people do something that is quite unusual.

 



SHEDDING POUNDS FOR THE PODIUM





In March 2009, after reconstructive hip surgery and a serious health scare, Carmine Posillipo recognized the importance of changing his lifestyle and losing weight.  He knew he would need some Olympic-sized motivation to help him stay committed to his goals and he drew his inspiration from Canada’s Olympic hopefuls.  He was excited by their dedication, commitment and passion for sport and quickly made the connection that he could use his lifestyle change to support the Canadian team. 

Carmine turned to his family and friends to support him in “Shedding Pounds for the Podium.”  He asked them to make a pledge for each pound he lost and the money raised would be donated to Own the Podium.  His family and friends were so supportive of this initiative and his desire to help Canadian athletes; they stepped up and collectively pledged over $56 per pound.  Carmine knew this “win-win” program would help him stay accountable and motivated when his goals seemed too daunting. 

 Carmine weighed 462 lbs (210 kg) at his first weigh-in on March 10th, 2009, and he is ecstatic to share that by his last weigh-in in February 2010 he had lost over 126 lbs (57.5 kg).  This equates to over $7,080 raised for Own the Podium to date!  And Carmine isn’t finished yet – his final weigh-in will be right before the Opening Ceremonies for the Vancouver 2010 Olympic Games.

 As an employee with the Vancouver Organizing Committee for the 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games (VANOC), Carmine exudes passion when he discusses the upcoming Games and Own the Podium.  He is overwhelmed by the support of his family, colleagues and friends, and said “I hope losing 135 lbs and consequentially raising $9,000 makes the difference for one Canadian athlete striving for the podium.”

 Carmine has clearly demonstrated through his persistence and determination that he is made of the same mettle as our Canadian athletes.  By pairing his commitment to a healthy lifestyle to supporting Canada’s top winter athletes – “Shedding Pounds for the Podium” may just be “win-win-win”!!

 If you would like to make a donation to Own the Podium, please visit www.olympicfoundation.ca